Select Your Region
External can coatings protect the visual appearance and integrity of the metal against abrasion, which may easily occur during processes of canning or transport. Internal can coatings prevent possible interaction and corrosion of the metal from food.
Good flow, leveling, and adhesion properties are required or both internal and external can coatings to prevent coverage defects and maximize the protective qualities of the coating. Good clarity, smoothness, gloss, and anti-blocking properties are necessary for external can coatings to highlight and preserve the aesthetics and integrity of the can.
Eastman’s Cellulose Acetate Butyrates (CABs) are naturally derived, sustainably sourced organic acid esters of cellulose. CAB-551-0.01 and Solus™ 2100 are two low–molecular weight CAB polymers used as additives to provide a variety of performance benefits in can coatings. They exhibit excellent solubility in a wide range of organic solvents, are compatible with many resins and plasticizers in coating formulations, and are food-contact-approved.
CAB-551-0.01 and Solus™ 2100 specifically benefit can coating formulations by forming films that have:
Through these qualities, Eastman CAB-551-0.01 and Solus™ 2100 improve the effectiveness and appearance of can coatings.
Tests were made using two coating formulations, presented in the next section; one was a clear coat formulation, and the other was a white-colored coating pigmented with titanium dioxide. These tests were made to quantify some of the improvements that CAB-551-0.01 and Solus™ 2100 provide to can coatings. Performance comparisons were made using these coatings with and without flow and leveling coating additives, which included CAB-551-0.01, Solus™ 2100, and a polyacrylate additive.
Description
|
Ingredient
|
No additive (%)
|
1% CAB-551-0.01 (%)
|
1% Polyacrylate (%)
|
1% Solus™ 2100 (%)
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Saturated polyester resin | Novasynt S1535-65a | 64.73 | 64.73 | 64.73 | 64.73 |
Melamine resin | Maprenal® MF612b | 15.03 | 15.03 | 15.03 | 15.03 |
Solvent | Solvesso™ 150c | 12.14 | 12.14 | 12.14 | 12.14 |
Dibasic ester solvent | Loxanol® CA 5308d | 8.10 | 7.10 | 7.10 | 7.10 |
Flow aid | Eastman CAB-551-0.01e | - | 1.00 | - | - |
Flow aid | Eastman Solus™ 2100e | - | - | - | 1.00 |
Flow aid | Polyacrylate based | - | - | 1.00 | - |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Description | Ingredient | No additive (%) | 1% CAB-551-0.01 (%) | 1% Polyacrylate (%) | 1% Solus™ 2100 (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Saturated polyester resin | Novasynt S1535-65a | 39.04 | 39.04 | 39.04 | 39.04 |
Melamine resin | Maprenal® MF612b | 8.33 | 8.33 | 8.33 | 8.33 |
Titanium dioxide pigment | Ti-Pure™ R-900c | 11.30 | 11.30 | 11.30 | 11.30 |
Aromatic 150 solvent | Solvesso™ 150d | 33.09 | 33.09 | 33.09 | 33.09 |
Dibasic ester solvent | Aerosil® 200e | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.14 |
Rheology modifier | Loxanol® CA 5308f | 8.10 | 7.10 | 7.10 | 7.10 |
Flow aid | Eastman CAB-551-0.01g | - | 1.00 | - | - |
Flow aid | Eastman Solus™ 2100g | - | - | - | 1.00 |
Flow aid | Polyacrylate based | - | - | 1.00 | - |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Specific gravity of formulations with no additive, 1% CAB-551-0.01, and 1% polyacrylate is 0.94 kg/L
Specific gravity of formulation with Solus™ 2100 is 0.93 kg/L
aNovaresine bINEOS cChemours dExxonMobil Chemical eEvonik fBASF gEastman Chemical Company
The test results in the following sections were exclusively from tests applying these formulations externally onto cans. However, similar test results are expected if the formulations are applied internally.
The first test evaluated the additives to reduce blocking and surface defects while increasing flow and leveling properties. Blocking reduction is critical to resist detrimental adhesion and ensure that coatings remain bonded to their original substrates, even when they are put in contact with another surface and pressure is applied. Improving flow and leveling allows for easier application and better coverage of can coatings. This also helps to eliminate common surface defects, such as orange peel, cratering, and fish eyes.
Both the clear and white-pigmented coating formulations were applied to precoated metal panel substrates, then tested for block rating via ASTM D3003-01 (2006). They were also evaluated for flow, leveling, and surface defects through examination of smoothness and visual imperfections. The higher numbers below are indicative of better coating performance.
Rating | Block Resistance | Flow and Leveling | Surface Defects |
---|---|---|---|
10 | Panels fall apart; no tackiness or adhesion | Perfect, smooth surface | No defects |
8 | Panels pull apart easily; slight tackiness and adhesion | Very smooth | Barely visible |
6 | Panels pull apart with effort; no prying | Smooth with slight imperfections | A few defects |
4 | Panels pull apart using reasonable force; very tacky | Smooth with numerous imperfections | Defects on 50% of panel |
2 | Panels require prying apart | Poor, uneven surface | Numerous surface defects |
0 | Panels block together; cannot be separated with without using extreme force | Very poor, uneven surface | Many surface defects |
The outcome of the gloss test supports the results obtained for the distinctness of image (DOI) test that came next, which was made using the clear coat formulation. DOI is determined by measuring gloss close to the angle of reflection on the substrate.
For many metal coating applications, DOI is an important attribute tied to the perception of the quality of the coated object. Higher DOI values indicate a sharper image reflected from the coated substrate. The result of the DOI test using the clear coat formulation is below.
As in the gloss test, the polyacrylate additive negatively impacted coating quality. In this case, the polyacrylate significantly decreased DOI and also created a hazy appearance within the coating. Comparatively, CAB-551-0.01 and Solus™ 2100 preserved DOI, indicating that using these additives for functionality enhancements will not compromise the visual quality of can coatings.
To better observe the haziness that occurred with the polyacrylate additive, the image below shows the clear coat with and without the additives examined in these tests. The haze caused by the polyacrylate additive can be plainly seen even after all formulations were left standing for 24 hours after being shaken.
PHONE 425.372.9328
We’ve detected that you are located in a different region than the region selected on the website. Would you like to change your region?
Current Region: English - Canada